manual/en/features.cookies.php

ARCHIVED 2014-06-25, DATE APPROXIMATE · VERSION 20140625_rev01 · COMPARED WITH 20140312_rev01

Full text changes — 20140312_rev01 to 20140625_rev01

COLOUR MARKS THE SEVERITY OF A FLAGGED CLAUSE · + AND − MARK ADDED AND REMOVED

33Any cookies sent to you from the client will automatically be included into a [$\_COOKIE](http://www.php.net/manual/en/reserved.variables.cookies.php) auto-global array if [variables\_order](http://www.php.net/manual/en/ini.core.php) contains "C". If you wish to assign multiple values to a single cookie, just add _\[\]_ to the cookie name.
44
55Depending on [register\_globals](http://www.php.net/manual/en/ini.core.php), regular PHP variables can be created from cookies. However it's not recommended to rely on them as this feature is often turned off for the sake of security. $HTTP\_COOKIE\_VARS is also set in earlier versions of PHP when the [track\_vars](http://www.php.net/manual/en/ini.core.php) configuration variable is set. (This setting is always on since PHP 4.0.3.)
66
77For more details, including notes on browser bugs, see the [setcookie()](http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.setcookie.php) and [setrawcookie()](http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.setrawcookie.php) function.
88
916
93
1010
11[**_Henry_**](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php) [¶](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php)
12
13**5 years ago**
14
15`It is better to note not to attach your cookies to and IP and block the IP if it is different as some people use Portable Browsers which will remember the cookies. It is better to show a login screen instead if the IP does not correspond to the session cookie's IP.`
16
174
18
19[**_myfirstname at braincell dot cx_**](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php) [¶](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php)
20
21**10 years ago**
22
23`[Editor's note: Wilson's comment has been deleted since it didn't contain much useful information, but this note is preserved although its reference is lost]`
24
25`Just a general comment on Wilton's code snippet: It's generally considered very bad practice to store usernames and/or passwords in cookies, whether or not they're obsfucated. Many spyware programs make a point of stealing cookie contents.`
26
27`A much better solution would be to either use the PHP built in session handler or create something similar using your own cookie-based session ID. This session ID could be tied to the source IP address or can be timed out as required but since the ID can be expired separately from the authentication criteria the authentication itself is not compromised.`
28
29`Stuart Livings`
30
313
32
1133[**_ingen at stocken.ws_**](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php) [¶](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php)
1234
1335**7 years ago**
1436
1537`If you want a secured session not tied to the client IP you can use the valid-for-one-query method below, but to safeguard against a scenario where the legitimate user clicks twice, you can use a shutdown function (register_shutdown_function)*.`
1638
3153`If you need a javascript for md5: [http://pajhome.org.uk/crypt/md5/md5src.html](http://pajhome.org.uk/crypt/md5/md5src.html)`
3254
3355`---`
3456
3557`* You could use session_set_save_handler and make sure the session ID is generated in the open function. I haven't done that so I can't make any comments on it yet.`
3658
376
59\-4
3860
39[**_myfirstname at braincell dot cx_**](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php) [¶](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php)
40
41**10 years ago**
42
43`[Editor's note: Wilson's comment has been deleted since it didn't contain much useful information, but this note is preserved although its reference is lost]`
44
45`Just a general comment on Wilton's code snippet: It's generally considered very bad practice to store usernames and/or passwords in cookies, whether or not they're obsfucated. Many spyware programs make a point of stealing cookie contents.`
46
47`A much better solution would be to either use the PHP built in session handler or create something similar using your own cookie-based session ID. This session ID could be tied to the source IP address or can be timed out as required but since the ID can be expired separately from the authentication criteria the authentication itself is not compromised.`
48
49`Stuart Livings`
50
511
52
53[**_Henry_**](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php) [¶](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php)
54
55**4 years ago**
56
57`It is better to note not to attach your cookies to and IP and block the IP if it is different as some people use Portable Browsers which will remember the cookies. It is better to show a login screen instead if the IP does not correspond to the session cookie's IP.`
58
59\-1
60
6161[**_Anonymous_**](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php) [¶](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php)
6262
63**10 months ago**
63**1 year ago**
6464
6565`Your note is too short. Trying to test the notes system? Save us the trouble of deleting your test, and don't. It works.`
6666
67\-2
67\-6
6868
6969[**_mega-squall at caramail dot com_**](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php) [¶](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php)
7070
7171**9 years ago**
7272
7373`I found a solution for protecting session ID without tying them to client's IP. Each session ID gives access for only ONE querry. On the next querry, another session ID is generated and stored. If somebody hacks the cookie (or the session ID), the first one of the user and the pirate that will use the cookie will get the second disconnected, because the session ID has been used.`
7575`If the user gets disconnected, he will reconnect : as my policy is not to have more than one session ID for each user (sessions entries have a UNIQUE key on the collomn in which is stored user login), every entries for that user gets wiped, a new session ID is generated and stored on users dirve : the pirate gets disconnected. This lets the pirate usually just a few seconds to act. The slower visitors are browsing, the longer is the time pirates get for hacking. Also, if users forget to explicitly end their sessions .... some of my users set timeout longer than 20 minutes !`
7676
7777`IMPORTANT NOTE : This disables the ability of using the back button if you send the session ID via POST or GET.`
7878
7979\-5
8080
81[**_kalla\_durga at gmail dot com_**](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php) [¶](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php)
81[**_bmorency at jbmlogic dot com_**](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php) [¶](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php)
8282
8383**8 years ago**
8484
8585`In response to the solution posted in the comment below, there are some practical issues with this solution that must be kept in mind and handled by your code. I developed an application using a similar "use-it-once" key to manage sessions and it worked great but we got some complaints about legitimate users getting logged out without reasons. Turns out the problem was not tentative highjacking, it was either:`
8686
8787`A- Users double click on links or make 2 clicks very fast. The same key is sent for the 2 clicks because the new key from the first click didn't get to the browser on time for the second one but the session on the server did trash the key for the new one. Thus, the second click causes a termination of the session. (install the LiveHttpHeaders extension on firefox and look at the headers sent when you click twice very fast, you'll see the same cookie sent on both and the new cookie getting back from the server too late).`
8888
8989`B- For any given reason, the server experiences a slow down and the response with the new key (which has replaced the old one on the server) is not returned to the browser fast enough. The user gets tired of waiting and clicks somewhere else. He gets logged out because this second click send the old key which won't match the one you have on your server.`
9090
9191`Our solution was to set up a grace period where the old key was still valid (the current key and the previous key were both kept at all times, we used 15 seconds as a grace period where the old key could still be used). This has the drawback of increasing the window of time for a person to highjack the session but if you tie the validity of the old key to an IP address and/or user agent string, you still get pretty good session security with very very few undesired session termination.`
9292
93\-6
93\-8
9494
95[**_bmorency at jbmlogic dot com_**](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php) [¶](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php)
95[**_kalla\_durga at gmail dot com_**](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php) [¶](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php)
9696
9797**8 years ago**
9898
9999`In response to the solution posted in the comment below, there are some practical issues with this solution that must be kept in mind and handled by your code. I developed an application using a similar "use-it-once" key to manage sessions and it worked great but we got some complaints about legitimate users getting logged out without reasons. Turns out the problem was not tentative highjacking, it was either:`
100100
101101`A- Users double click on links or make 2 clicks very fast. The same key is sent for the 2 clicks because the new key from the first click didn't get to the browser on time for the second one but the session on the server did trash the key for the new one. Thus, the second click causes a termination of the session. (install the LiveHttpHeaders extension on firefox and look at the headers sent when you click twice very fast, you'll see the same cookie sent on both and the new cookie getting back from the server too late).`
102102
103103`B- For any given reason, the server experiences a slow down and the response with the new key (which has replaced the old one on the server) is not returned to the browser fast enough. The user gets tired of waiting and clicks somewhere else. He gets logged out because this second click send the old key which won't match the one you have on your server.`
104104
105105`Our solution was to set up a grace period where the old key was still valid (the current key and the previous key were both kept at all times, we used 15 seconds as a grace period where the old key could still be used). This has the drawback of increasing the window of time for a person to highjack the session but if you tie the validity of the old key to an IP address and/or user agent string, you still get pretty good session security with very very few undesired session termination.`
106106
107\-15
107\-61
108108
109109[**_meetyashah at gmail dot com_**](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php) [¶](http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php)
110110
111**10 months ago**
111**1 year ago**
112112
113113`PAGE 1`
114114
115115`<?php echo $_COOKIE["first"]; ?> PAGE 2`
116116
117117`<?php if(isset($_COOKIE["first"])) { echo $_COOKIE["first"];} echo '<br />'; if(isset($_COOKIE["second"])){ echo $_COOKIE["second"]; } echo '<br />'; if(isset($_COOKIE["third"])){ echo $_COOKIE["third"]; } ?>`